When I picked up the book for summer reading, I really had no idea what to expect. “Ordinary radical” is not a common phrase to come across, but it made more sense as Claiborne explained the roots of the words. Funny how it really fits one of the recurring themes of the book: when things diverge from the way they actually started and were originally meant to be). He spent much of the book describing what some of today’s generation of Christians were doing to go back to their roots and following the “Way” (Jesus). He did a lot of explaining the early church (the one that started in Acts) and described how they lived their lives as Jesus lived his (living among and with the poor and the ill, sharing and caring for all, and going against the ways of the world).
Claiborne focused on several things that the early church was known for, which were community and love. Those two go together. Love builds community and community builds and strengthens love. His idea was that when people come together and are able to see themselves in others (human life and value) that they would change and improve the lives of others. Communities shared what they had: needs, gifts, love, problems. In doing so communities are both self-sustaining and sustain selves (individual lives). I really going to leap of subject now and mention the efforts of the Boy Scouts. They actually do tie in to all this just because of their efforts to build bridges between cultures, religions and nowadays, even gender. The idea is to help people find things in common with each other, and if they don’t share much, they create and do things together. I mention this because as I was reading the book my uncle and step-cousin returned from England and shared with the rest of the family their experiences at the 100th anniversary jamboree. They put a lot of emphasis on the what it was like to see so many nations and countries represented and what it was like to see so many people come together with the same purpose and sharing a common bond. It sounded like the scouts were having more success in connecting multitudes of people and coming closer to ending conflict than Christianity was.
Anyway, back to the book. I really enjoyed the fact that Claiborne was consistent in the way he used metaphors and images to get his message across. Fire (in the passionate, spreading sense, not the destructive sense [although the church has done plenty of destructive burning in the past and present]), the mustard seed (again, something that starts small then spreads and is hard to remove), as well as laughter (it was mentioned as contagious, get one person to start and soon the entire room will), these were all things that could start small and unseen but would grow and spread with the potential to become unstoppable. It really helps when there is a consistent message throughout the book, no matter how many different tangents the book seems to take. Although, my impression was that it pretty much boiled down to Jesus. If people would do as Jesus did, saw the world as he saw it, and loved the way he loved then we really wouldn’t have the tortured world we have now. The book tried to describe love in actions (working with the lepers, helping people die with dignity, living with the people in Iraq, sharing house, home (not always the same thing as house) and food…). This was the down and dirty love; it worked and struggled towards its goal. It was sometimes unrequited but it persisted and it had power.
Well anyway, these were some of my impressions of the book.
Recent Comments