I
can't believe we are actually reading something that would have had a stamp of
disapproval from Luther...But I suppose he wasn't the ONLY smart person in the
world, now, was he? I mean, William
Perkins studied and taught at Cambridge (though I'm not arguing that being a
professor automatically makes you correct in your thinking). He had a lot of big thoughts about the
meaning of vocation, and though his original ideas came from the philosophy of
Aristotle (a person distrusted by Luther), he became one of the first Puritan
leaders to really discuss vocation in the way that is presented in this
writing.
Perkins defines vocation and/or calling a being a
"certain kind of life, ordained and imposed on man by God for the common
good" (262). Whatever your profession
or status in this world, that is your calling according to Perkins. I'm not sure yet that this is a complete
definition of "calling," but I'll be sure to let you know when I
decide by the end of this post. This
book is basically filled with different ideas about this, and he does say that
this is just one opinion, so I'm not really going to worry about it too much
just yet. He makes me feel better about
it when he goes into his description of general and particular callings. According to Perkins, the general calling is
being called to Christianity, and all Christians share this same calling. The particular calling is the jobs that we
are given to do on this earth. And I
feel even better when Perkins goes on to discuss the two causes of vocation/calling. The first of these is the efficient cause,
which is basically the person or place from which the calling comes. Perkins argues that every calling comes from
God, making Him the sole efficient cause in our lives and in the world. God calls each of us to do a job, either by
speaking to us Himself or by mediating through the world around us. The second cause of vocation is the final
cause, or the purpose of the calling.
Perkins considers every calling to be "for the common good,"
as stated in his definition of vocation.
We are the body of Christ, and we have to look out for each other, not
just ourselves. We cannot keep our two
callings separate. Perkins says that
"every man must join the practice of his personal calling with the
practice of the general calling of Christianity" (268).
Okay. I am definitely happier with his definition
now. Just saying.
Since
I am working with a Lutheran church this year, I get to see a lot of examples
of how people combine their callings in order to serve both the Church and
humankind in general. I've teachers who
allow their faith in Christ to influence the way they approach discipline in
the classroom. I've met store owners who
make sure to give their customers the best prices they can because they know
it's the right thing to do. I've met all
sorts of people who do their paid jobs well and still devote time to helping
those in need in the congregation and in the community. For these individuals, being a Christian is
not just a calling that they live out on Sunday mornings. It's a lifestyle, and it's one they are proud
of. We've really been working with our
youth this year to make sure they understand this fundamental aspect of
Christianity, and it's amazing to see how far they've come in being able to
live their faith with love and boldness.
But when you surround kids with the type of role models that exist at
the Alley, how could they NOT be growing?

Recent Comments