October 2008 Archives

Directive Writing 5

| No Comments

The Enlightenment age was a change in thought of what was widely accepted during the Age of Faith.   This way of thinking challenged the traditions, the religion, and the politics of the older ages.  The Enlightenment age has often been paired up with the Age of Reason, which took place in the 1700s.  These thoughts encouraged people to think for themselves, and use their right to reason.  The Enlightenment thought stressed not to depend on the traditions of past, but the reasons of change and progress from the laws of nature.  These three concepts of reason, nature, and change and progress were the basics of Enlightenment and were used by Thomas Jefferson to write the American Declaration of Independence.  The Declaration of Independence was a plea for reason.  It was written for the King of England, and stated that the thirteen colonies under Great Britain were now independent from the country.  The writing was used, as Jefferson explains, "not merely to say things which had never been said before" but to challenge mankind to look at and "place in front of them the commonsense of the subject in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent" and use reason as the basis of freedom (Age of the Sage 1). The Declaration of Independence was written in 1776, during the last years of the Enlightenment.   Another influence on the Declaration of Independence, apart from the Enlightenment was Deism.  Deism is known as a rationalistic religion.   Roughly, deists believe that the Creator gave humans the ability to reason and then remained distant from the creation after giving them this ability. Deism was one of the main religious thoughts during the Age of Reason due to its view on reason and the ability of man to understand.  Together, Deism and the Enlightenment influenced Thomas Jefferson in his writing of the Declaration of Independence.

There are three main concepts of the Enlightenment.  The first is reason.  Reason stresses that "all assumptions should be subjected to critical and empirical reasoning" (Harrison 2).  No longer were ideas and customs accepted solely because they were supported by tradition; instead, Enlightenment thinkers felt that all traditional thoughts and ways of life should be examined and reasoned.  This is exactly what Jefferson stresses in the Declaration of Independence.  Jefferson says that not only should people put old traditions that have turned destructive to reason, but it is indeed "becomes necessary" (Jefferson 1).  During the whole Declaration, Jefferson uses reason to explain why the states are becoming independent.  He uses this by examples of what the king and the nation of Great Britain have done to upset and deny the freedom of the colonies.  Reason is behind everything that Jefferson argues.

Nature is the second concept of Enlightenment; it stresses that the nature of the world is "governed by a few simple and unchangeable laws" (Harrison 3).  The law of nature and the law of reason function with one another.  This nature began as good, but humans, such as the King, had corrupted it with restrictions.  Therefore, Jefferson argues, it is the right of the people to go back to nature, and freedoms.  Jefferson continually uses the phrase "laws of nature" as a standard to how society should be treated (Jefferson 1).  He uses this as a self-evident truth.  The truths he stresses are "life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness", and that all men have these rights (Jefferson 1).  Jefferson's argument was that the King was not following with these obvious truths, and thus the colonies had the right to separate.

Change and progress is the third concept of the Enlightenment.  Change is viewed as a very positive thing, which goes hand and hand with progress.  Enlightened thinkers believe that "change, when dictated by reason and when in line with nature, liberates individuals" (Harrison 4).  Jefferson used this concept by combining both reason and nature, along with change to produce progress of liberated individuals.  Underlining the declaration is the sense that humans are naturally good, but other outside restriction and religion have distorted the human thinking.  Jefferson wants change to happen with the relationship with the colonies and Great Britain, and believes only progress will come of the change.

For some Christians, the concept of nature and reason often conflicts with their beliefs.  The Age of Enlightenment therefore bred a new type of belief that complimented the value of reason.  This was notably "popular among some upper-class Americans at the time of the American Revolution" including Thomas Jefferson (Reid 1).  This belief system, however, was more of an intellectual movement then a religious one.  Deism believed that "all men naturally possess the ability to know the universe's Deity through reason, and that the creator of the universe was a rational architect" (Reid 1).  This made God only partly necessary, and gave power to man to decide what was right and what was not, in accordance to nature.  Jefferson uses Deism quite often to stress his points, mentioning "Nature's God" or "Creator" to give power from above to give power to the men who want the change and progress (Jefferson 1). 

Jefferson was an enlightened Deist thinker in the 18th century. The influence of the Age of Reason made a huge impact on what Jefferson wrote in the American Declaration of Independence and how it was stated and organized.  No longer were tradition and past customs allowed to violate other humans.  Using reason, law of nature and change, progress happened.  The freedom of the thirteen colonies begins the revolutionary war and after the fighting, the people of the colonies finally won their independence from England in 1783.  Jefferson was able to promote and help start change and progress of the states through the Declaration of Independence.

Directive Writing 5

| No Comments

Directive Writing 4

| No Comments

      How can one successfully talk about truth?  There is so much uncertainty in a conversation about truth that it is necessary to have some certain truths agreed upon and believed about before one can begin.  These truths; ones that cannot be proven, but need to be accepted for a conversation about truth, are called the three primary truths.  Without the primary truths, people would be talking in circles around truth; unable to grasp or even define truth.  The three primary truths include; the fact of human's existence, the principle of non-contradiction, and the condition of the ability of the mind to know the truth.  The principle and condition of the primary truths directly relate to the relationship between reason and faith. 

Reason and faith have been perceived as opposites throughout the age of modernity, though before modernity reason and faith were viewed of having harmony in one another.  Thomas Aquinas was a philosopher and theologian in the thirteenth century who was interested in this relationship of reason and faith.  Thomas' teaching in the seventh chapter of Summa Contra Gentiles discusses the connection in both reason and faith together. Thomas states at the beginning of the chapter, "The truth of reason is not in opposition to the truth of Christian faith".  This statement is the focus of the seventh chapter.  Thomas uses the primary truths of non-contradiction and the ability of the mind to know the truth to demonstrate his conviction of the harmony between reason and faith.  The principle of non-contradiction and the condition of the mind's ability to know truth are in vital need to be accepted in order for Thomas' arguments to be valid.  Thomas heavily depends on these truths to prove that reason and faith do not contradict each other but in fact compliment.

                Thomas believes that if two things are true, than they simply cannot contradict one another.  If they do contradict, one must be false.  In this statement lies in the first principle--there are no contradictions in truth.  In order to make his argument, Thomas gives reasons why both reason and faith are true.  Reason is a naturally implanted principle; given to humans by God.  It is impossible for a human to think these reasons to be false.  This naturally instilled reason can be included in science, math and any other man-based reasoning.  Yet, if anytime the reasoning of men conflict with God and faith in Him; it is not the truth anymore.  Knowledge through faith has been given by God.  God has confirmed the truth of faith to humans along with the truth of reason, therefore both are true.  Thomas says that because both are true, and the principle of non-contradiction holds to be true, "it is impossible" for the truth from faith to be contrary to "those principles which reason knows naturally".  It simply cannot happen.  If one truth does conflict with the other truth, then the one of the truths is false and cannot be true. 

                Thomas stresses the first condition; human minds have the ability to know the truth.  He uses this primary truth for argument that God has indeed implanted natural reasoning so that humans can understand the truth of Him.  Thomas concludes, "Whatever arguments are alleged against the teachings of faith, do not rightly proceed from the first self-evident principles instilled by nature".  This statement shows that humans are indeed instilled with self-evident principles which help one grasp the concept of truth.  Without this instilled knowledge, to even talk about truth would be pointless.  Thomas ties in this condition again with the idea that God has given humans both the ability to know truth; and the truth itself.  The significance of this statement is that God instilled this ability to know truth so that one may use that reason to discover His truth, God did not instill in humans conflicting knowledge--knowledge that disproves Him.  Any knowledge that humans have that disproves God and the knowledge humans have by faith, is not naturally instilled, therefore not truth. 

                Together these two primary truths lead to the harmony of reason and faith.  One conflicting with the other is not true.  Humans have the ability to know what truth is and are given this ability, along with the gift of reasoning, to be able to discern God's truth.  Why then should reasoning and faithfulness be opponents?  They have a direct correlation together that should be embraced.  They complement one another when there are no answers for the other. Reason and faith work together in harmony.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2008 is the previous archive.

November 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.