April 2009 Archives

Family Roots

| No Comments
Today we had Professor Phil Tesch in to speak about genealogy. We started out going around the room with each of us telling our family last names on both sides of the family and what origin the names came from. We discussed the purposes for doing genealogical work which among many were ignorance of family origin, hoping to find past wealth or royalty in your blood line, and just to know as much about your family history as possible. He referred to this as an Obsessive-compulsive history hunt. We looked at some of the top sites for looking up family information and finished out the class with a video on genealogy. Overall, the class was very informative.

Talking about tracing family roots in an effort to find royalty or wealth made me think of the immigrants who had to prove a family presence was established in America to gain entrance to the country. Genealogy is a tool that can be used for a vast spectrum of activity. It seems ridiculous that while some look to find an "in" to the high society life through possible inheritance or being the heir to a throne, other's fight to join family members in the "land of opportunity". For those who fight to get into the country, that is only the first part of the battle. From the other works we have read this semester, In the Middle of Everywhere and What is the What, we learn that the struggle only continues once immigrants gain entrance to the US. They face other struggles such as racism, financial troubles and language barriers to over come. This seem to trivialize the idea of instant wealth through linage when looking at the struggle some go through only to struggle more.

This session made me want to trace my roots properly. Fortunately, my family genealogy has been done on both sides of my family. I have simply lacked the drive to dive into the information. I know that I have family in Norway to the tune of first cousins, but I have never taken the time to talk to then. After going to the convocation on In Cod we Trust and learning about genealogy today, I find myself lacking excuses to not act on the desire that has been in the back of my mind for some time. I have a small family and it would not be hard to get to know them a little better, at least where we come from and what we have in common.

Poehler Lecture

| No Comments
Last night marked the Eight installment of the Poehler Lecture series. Dr. Carl Schoenbeck was the speaker for the evening and highlighted "One educators perspective on educating the children well". He has an extensive background in education ranging from teaching to administration making him nothing short of qualified for the honor of Poehler lecturer. The theme of the series is the idea of integrating faith and learning. Dr. Schoenbeck shared his knowledge and experience from his perspective through the idea of a three-part recipe: connections, application, and question. As he expounded on these three ideas, he used the metaphor of rope. Faith is at the core of the rope we call learning. Many different disciplines can be taught and integrated into one another, keeping at the center the most important aspect of life, faith. 

It is not difficult for the honors students to make connections to a lecture that is based upon the central idea of the program they are in. I will give an examples that does pertain specifically to myself. On Monday of this week, we had a speaker come in and share information on immigration policy. She is a lawyer who does pro bono work on immigrant policy cases. Among the many ways I was able to connect my previous experiences to this Monday night session, statistics was the most relied on knowledge of the evening. She presented many stories of the terrible actions and consequences of the government agency ICE. They terrorize immigrant families as they conduct raids and tear families a part. I am not a heartless person and I believe that compassion flows from faith in Christ, but I also use the mind and knowledge that God has blessed me with to analyze situations. Stats taught me to be skeptical of what I hear, and the data presented on Monday seemed very one-sided. I was reminded of this during the lecture last night as Dr. Schoenbeck discussed his perspective.

I was not surprised by the information that was presented last night as we live what Dr. Schoenbeck was sharing. I do appreciate what the program offers after hearing the value of the program from someone that is not on the inside. People always believe something easier as a child when it doesn't come from a parent, and the case is the same with the honors program. You don't believe that you are really benefiting until you hear from someone else what a benefit it is and what the alternative could be. We live a life of integrated learning, and it took a night of stepping back and looking at the whole picture to refocus the tunnel vision I get from the constant grind of school.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from April 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

March 2009 is the previous archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.