October 2008 Archives

Directed Writing #4

| No Comments

Meri Pearson

 

Directed Writing 4

 

In order to understand life as a whole, three important concepts need to be understood. Without these three principles, it's hard to prove the fact that we exist as humans. The first fact accepting the fact that human do really exist. No one can deny the fact that everyone here on earth, actually exists because otherwise this life would be just a mirage. Another basic principle that needs to be talked about it the principle of non-contradiction. What this is saying, is that by not contradicting ones thoughts, if a statement can be contradicted it isn't the truth it will make it clearer, and more of a known what the realization is. The last thing to take into account is the idea of the mind already knowing the truth. Another way to explain this is the basic instinct of knowing. Everyone is born with the ability to know, it is the natural born gift. Through these aspects, of knowing, it can be inferred that these points are all important to the human function. Evidence of the principle of non-contradiction, and the first condition, can be found in the Chapter VII in St. Thomas Aquinas. In St. Thomas Aquinas, he brings up the subject of "the truth of reason is not in opposition to the truth of the Christian faith." This is the subject in which will be discussed. 

The first principle of knowing is the non-contradictory principle. St. Thomas Aquinas says in chapter VII, "Consequently whatever is contrary to these principles is contrary to the divine Wisdom; wherefore it cannot be from God. Therefore those things which are received by faith from divine revelation cannot be contrary to our natural knowledge." What he is trying to say here is that, the truth is the truth because otherwise, it would not be true. Furthermore, this is describing the idea of that if a statement can be contradicted then it was not a true statement to begin with. Aquinas goes on saying that "our intellect is stayed by contrary arguments, so that it cannot advance to the knowledge of truth." What he is saying is that, contrary argument just starts the process of the ways of knowing. It creates the thinking process in order to prove that something is true in all of its being. Basically, if a statement can be contradicted, it is not the truth to begin with. This is because, it will create doubt, and uncertainty and go against the other principles.

Another point that Aquinas brings up is the act of knowing the truth. "Now the knowledge of naturally known principles is instilled into us by God, since God Himself is the author of our nature." What Aquinas is saying is that, with the first condition, which is the mind's ability to understand the truth that this thought process came from God. A Christian would say that God is the ultimate being, in which creates humans in his eyes, therefore, when the question of where truth comes, the answer is from God. This is the same principle in which St. Thomas Aquinas believed in. The way of knowing, and making a conclusion of anything that is being questioned is given to the thinker by God. This might be a harder concept for some to grasp, not being a Christian, but all could say, that they are made up with the idea of knowing, and the knowledge which comes along with it. Humans are born with this, and it is just a natural gift in which all posses.  The easiest way of saying it, is that it is a natural knowledge. Everyone has this part in their brain in which decides what is fact or fiction, whether something is wrong or right, or if something is good or bad. Every person on this planet posses this knowledge, and it is something in which happens at birth. St. Thomas Aquinas, says that this way of truth, is given by God, so does many Americans, including this reader. The fact, in which humans are born with this ability to decide, and decipher, is something bigger than just this world itself. It is definitely ability given from above.

Through all of this, St. Thomas Aquinas ends off this chapter with these words. "From this we may evidently conclude that whatever arguments are alleged against the teachings of faith, they do not rightly proceed from the first self0evident principles instilled by nature." Through the principle of non-contradiction, and the idea of knowing the truth since birth, have created the building blocks of the ways of knowing. The ways of knowing reaches out to everyone, whether it be Christians, atheist and alike, the ways of knowing, are universal, and in order to be considered truth, it has to go through these principles.  

Directed Writing #3

| No Comments

Directed Writing #3

Maya Angelou is a well known author in today's society due to her ability to write on issues. With her classic novels, such as, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, she has written about matters affecting the marginalized in this world. Angelou tends to write about those whose rights are being taken away, or who did not have them in the first place. Angelou used her writing to show her civil rights personality and to make her opinion known how she feels about the real issues in life. This is apparent in her poem "A Brave and Startling Truth". She takes her Civil Rights Activist role, and puts it into writing, sharing her true thoughts on the "Startling truth".

Angelou is a strong activist of civil rights, she adds this to her works. With the title "A Brave and Startling Truth" she is referencing the civil rights movement. To break this down a little more to make sense out of this people, a "startling truth" is what is going to be explained. When reading the poem, there is an issue at hand that is being discussed. By knowing the context of the author, and knowing what she stands for it can be inferred that she is writing about racism. In this world today, even centuries after the civil rights movement, we are still dealing with issues about it. This is the basic principle Angelou is writing about.

Maya Angelou writes:

And when we come to it

To the day of peacemaking

When we release our fingers

                                    From fists of hostility

And allow the pure air to cool our palms what is when everyone can put down our differences, and finally accept people for who they really are. It will be the day when there is no more hatred because a person doesn't act or think like us, it will be the day of peace between all. (A Brave and Startling Truth)

In this excerpt, she is expressing, how it is just an idealistic idea to have racism abolished. The "startling truth", should be called a basic truth instead. Everyone does have the right to be who they are without any judgment from a different party. It shows how different our world is when people do not get along and how it needs to be a good environment so that everyone does get along.

            When reading this poem, I began to understanding it right away. I knew a little history of Angelou, and it definitely helped to come to my thoughts about this poem. The idea she brought up for the "startling truth" is a valid one. She takes in consideration that the idea of peace between nations is a radical, and hard thing to get accomplished. In today's society, so many things are focused on hatred, and getting back at someone, that having peace between enemies, sounds really hard for one to do. I do feel though that through her poem, she got her point across and reached out to every background, making peace in her head and peace between everyone around her.

 

Angelou, Maya. "A Brave and Startling Truth."

Directed Writing #2

| No Comments

Postmodernism

"This sentence serves no logical purpose."

 

"Postmodernism is a complicated term, or set of ideas, one that has only emerged as an area of academic study since the mid-1980s. Postmodernism is hard to define, because it is a concept that appears in a wide variety of disciplines or areas of study, including art, architecture, music, film, literature, sociology, communications, fashion, and technology. It's hard to locate it temporally or historically, because it's not clear exactly when postmodernism begins," says  Mary Klages, an author of Continuum Press.   Postmodernism is a new theory of thinking that is coming to be more apparent in today society. But what exactly does postmodernism mean?  As the author Mary Klages said, it's a complicated term, which emerged from the different areas of learning. Whether it is science, the arts, or theology, post modernism, is a concept in which people in today's society are trying to get a grasp on. What is exactly considered postmodernism? Another author says that "postmodernism is 'post' because it is denies the existence of any ultimate principles, and it lacks the optimism of there being a scientific, philosophical, or religious truth which will explain everything for everybody - a characteristic of the so-called "modern" mind. The paradox of the postmodern position is that, in placing all principles under the scrutiny of its skepticism, it must realize that even its own principles are not beyond questioning (Postmodernism)."

 Postmodernism has many concepts involved to actually define it. First of all, postmodernism came after modernism. Even though these two concepts share the last syllables, this does not mean that they are related. The definition of modernism is putting ideas into thought; having a purpose for the beliefs, and making them a common aspect to everyday life.  Modernism is a "western" idea, which indicates that it was an older practice which has taken over society and what people are more accustomed too. However, when talking about postmodernism, everything that is true with modernism is completely different. One might think that since there is sharing of a root word, something similar would come out of it, but it does not. Postmodernism is the theory of uncertainty. Postmodernism leaves open a large gap of whether or not the thought process is necessary to obtain a conclusion.  The classic process of determining a true thought is through these primary truth principles. In order to say something is true these concepts have to be taken into consideration. Firstly, the fact of the people existence, is everything on this planet, actually here? Secondly, the thought of non-contradiction pertaining to life as a whole; life cannot be a contradicting statement. The last factor to add in is the ability of one's mind to know the truth. The last three concepts that were mentioned all have to deal with the assumptions of human nature. These are all perceptions humans take into account in order to be considered a decision.  Even though, people have been taught this message of these basic truths, the postmodernist's choice to challenge the old ideas and come up with new innovative ideas. Postmodernist regularly question and base decisions after thorough analysis.

What would a postmodernist have to say about this quote; "This sentence serves no logical purpose."  First of all, a postmodernist would have to ask themselves a question, what is the purpose for this?  One very important aspect of post modernity is the lesser people have authority. The people who that are normally looked down upon, are the ones who have power within the community. Is this sentence reaching out to those who are unheard? After analysis one could defer that this sentence has a purpose, but it is not a common purpose that is dealt with everyday.  The reader feels as if there is some sort of skepticism within the sentence. With the structure that it is in, the words "serves", "logical" and "purpose" seem to stick out the most. After reading the sentence, it is hard to point out the flaws which would be in favor of over theories but instead this is creating more of an opportunity to open the postmodernists view. Skepticism is one of the core principals involved with postmodernity. Skepticism brings on the ideas of the truth, and how it affects the world as we knew it. The sentence above addresses this aspect of postmodernity, and as far as the reader is concerned, there is nothing in which to prove that the statement has a purpose.

Another part of postmodernity that should be addressed is the function of this statement. From an English perspective, it is a correct usage of verb, noun, and all of that, but that is not exactly a way to determining where postmodernity starts and ends. Postmodernity is a mental process, where the brain will weed out what is important and what is not. "This sentence serves no logical purpose." does not have a dominant function. The function of it is more of trying to figure it out. From research, it can be known that postmodernity can never be proven wrong or right. Through the thought process of trying to find the function, one can defer this statement is a postmodernitie's approach of life, and is a strong statement that supports the definition which was mentioned earlier.

Whether postmodernity is dealing with theology, science or art, it is definitely a new theological thought process which will be going through more heads as the years goes on. Since the fall of modernity, it's time for postmodernity to make its debut in everyday society. With the ideas of skepticism, not knowing the whole truth, and putting the focus on the marginalized, it creates a new form in which can be confusing, but after some studying can turn into a new way of thinking and may even change the world.

Bibliography

Klagas, Mary. "Literary Theory: A Guide for the Perplexed." Continuum Press January 2007 25 Sep 2008 <http://www.colorado.edu/English/courses/ENGL2012Klages/pomo.html>.

Unknown, "Postmodernism." 25 Sep 2008 <http://www.pbs.org/faithandreason/gengloss/postm-body.html>.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from October 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2008 is the previous archive.

December 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.