I love to laugh, so in Mechthild's description of the six virtues of St. Dominic, one of her quotes caught my eye. She lived in the thirteenth century and left her life a daughter in a noble family to join a Beguine community and live a life of prayer and mortification. This excerpt comes from her book The Flowing Light of the Godhead, which was a description of her visions from God. As Placher writes, this section "shows her characteristically gentle (but systematic!) approach, her admiration of St. Dominic and the 'Order of Preachers' (Dominicans) he founded, and her ideal of leaders who would be truly the servants of those they lead" (Callings, 150). I think Mechthild would certainly agree that "I" should be a Christian. She talks about the transformation from sinner to virtuous being that comes with following God. I'm not sure, however, how she'd feel about the word public. Her description of a faithful bride who awakens and thinks of her lover makes me think that her outlook on Christianity is focused on the personal, even intimate, relationship one has with Christ. I don't mean to say that she would discourage public faith, but I don't think that's her main focus.
The quote that really stood out to me falls under the heading "The Six Virtues of St. Dominic." After describing his first four characteristics, Mechthild writes,
And our Lord continued: 'I shall mention two more things. Whenever Dominic laughed, he did so with true delight of the Holy Spirit. But when he wept, he wept with such sincerity that first and foremost among his desires he always put his brethren before my eyes and, in addition, with all his strength, Holy Christianity." Before this I did not know that any laughing could be free of frivolity and not wrong.... (Mechthild, as cited in Callings, 151).
I feel as if the phrase "gave you a new insight" might be a bit of an exaggeration of my reaction to this quote, but it absolutely made me stop and think. I don't understand how someone could live their life thinking all laughter was wrong, lacking value or significance, and just flat out buffoon like (I looked up frivolity in my dictionary and acting like a buffoon was in the definition). I can understand thinking that laughter at really lame jokes (like the ones I try and make a lot) or inappropriate things can be unnecessary, but to say that all laughter, up until the point of St. Dominic, was insignificant and wrong is something I can't fathom. I'm guessing Mechthild probably wouldn't have liked me. But, on the other hand, what kind of laughter must St. Dominic have had if it could change such a terrible view? I wish I had that kind of laughter, laughter "with true delight of the Holy Spirit." Working with Make-A-Wish, and the wish children, I have a feeling there's going to be some laughter, at least I hope there will be anyways (I speak in future tense because I'm going to be granting my first wish with a child in the near future). And what laughter could contain more "true delight" than that of child who is having their wildest dream turned into reality? Maybe "a new insight" is an appropriate term. Though it sounds kind of cheesy, Mechthild has inspired me to look for laughter containing "the true delight of the Holy Spirit" not just during my project, but everywhere. Maybe hearing some will help me to stop wasting laughter on frivolous things.
